• Zoolander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    The numbers are bullshit and this isn’t even a study. It’s an analyses of insurance data that was done wrong.

    The top 3 “safest” cars are all makes and models that are no longer in production. Mercury, the #1, hasn’t made a new vehicle since 2011, Pontiac since 2009, and Saturn since 2010.

    It’s a bullshit story.

    • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      And all it analyzes is people’s driving record and the current model of vehicle they’re trying to insure. Someone who got rear-ended in a Honda and had their car totaled who is now trying to insure their new Tesla would be included in this even though they didn’t crash their Tesla nor were they at fault for the accident.

  • Dave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    PSA: This “study” is crap.

    Link to actual study

    They base their findings on incidents per driver, not per mile driven. Maybe the “safest” drivers here just…don’t drive their vehicles all that much?

    • mob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Also, like you said… incidents, not accidents.

      accidents, DUIs, speeding and citations

      Which I bet includes things like parking tickets and all that. Tbh, seems like most “studies” posted to Lemmy are crap tbh

  • SpaceBar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    Another thing about Teslas is that even a slight fender bender that does no damage to an older car will cause damage. The bumpers are full of sensors, all pastic, and repairs are expensive.

    I wonder if more minor accidents are reported in Teslas causing the numbers to be higher?

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Plastic front and end panel is pretty standard and since they are expensive cars its no wonder they cost a ton to repair, like if you bump into a Mercedes s class that’s not cheap either.

      You can shit on teslas for a lot of reasons but I don’t think yours is valid as being tesla specific

      • SpaceBar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I own a tesla. My comment is not a dig on the car, but a possible explanation for the increased accident rate.

    • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The bumpers are full of sensors, all pastic, and repairs are expensive.

      This is the same for all semi-modern cars. Plastic bumbers, even without sensors in them, are surprisingly expensive even on cheaper cars. But the good thing about plastic bumbers, is that they are fairly elastic and most often just bounce back into shape after the amount of deformation a slight fender bender can cause. And scratches are only a cosmetic concern since they can’t rust.

      Also, Tesla removed the ultrasonic sensors from both front and rear bumpers a while back.

  • Eideen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think this study is incomplete.

    Since this study is based on a ratio of accidents vs sold car. Newer cars models have less idle car, helping the statistics of older car models/companies. Given that Tesla and other more price models, will use insurance for minors damage, do to the cost of reparation vs lost sales value.

    At Codan, it is Kia’s electric cars that top the damage statistics, closely followed by Tesla’s and Hyundai’s electric cars. Richvoldsen emphasizes that it is Kia’s electric cars that top the list, and that the damage statistics do not apply to fossil fuel-powered Kia cars.

    https://www.tu.no/artikler/tesla-har-92-prosent-oftere-skader-enn-fossilbiler-br/484354

  • ar0b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    In this study, Subaru had 30 incidents per 1000 driver’s, and Tesla had 31. Why don’t I hear anyone bitching about Subarus?

  • chakan2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Headline: Tesla drives desperate to show they’re not this biggest assholes on the road.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I have a feeling this list would be very different if motorcycle brands were in the mix as well.