Just once I’d like a post where everyone is chill and positive about stuff instead of focusing on negative

Edit: I dunno why I expect people to ever be capable of being positive anymore. Dunno why I bother.

  • brvslvrnst@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Am I the only one enjoying Lower Decks and Strange New Worlds as they come out then? 🙃

    • Infynis@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’re not. Lower Decks and Strange New Worlds are very popular. They’re fantastic shows. The ones people don’t really like currently are Picard and Discovery.

      • brvslvrnst@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Fair enough! Those are the ones I have heard pretty much nothing about except in jabs about them. Thanks!

        • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Probably because they’re not very popular in the first place: people have to like the shows enough to keep watching them for there to be any content, and most people do not.

          • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Red Letter Media is masochistic at times and I think they cover Picard pretty thoroughly.

      • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s like when they made Picard and discovery they couldn’t decide what kind of show they wanted to make. Then someone was like “hey, what if we made star trek?” and strange new worlds was born

        • Infynis@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah, that was my main problem with Discovery when it first came out. It had been so long since we’d had Star Trek, and then they made a new Star Trek show. I was so excited. And then they didn’t do Star Trek.

          Stamets convinced me to give it another shot though, and I’m on season 4 now, and since Season 3, it really has been Star Trek. I just watched an episode where the ship got captured, and they had to take it back by being clever and competent. And then they fought for the rights of a sentient computer. Really classic Trek scenarios. I like most of the characters now, and while it’s still serialized, it’s more episodic than it was. Season 3 episode 2 got me to really love three characters I previously didn’t really even like.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nope. Not at all. I can’t wait for more.

      Discovery … I still can’t believe what they did to the Klingons and I have other issues but… goddamnit that show won me over in spite of itself. Will start season 3 in a while. And I liked the first two seasons of Picard I don’t care what anyone says.

      I might be alone in saying all that, idk lol

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          Discovery had soooo much for Klingon nerds: Hours upon hours of dialogue in Klingon, and (without actually knowing Klingon) with proper pronunciation, tons of warrior honour culture and its existential clash with federation ideals, and people are complaining about hair. Fucking hair.

        • Jaccident@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          TNG didn’t redesign the Klingons, that was the The Motion Picture with subsequent small revisions through the TOS films.

      • Seven@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I enjoyed the first two seasons of Picard more than the third. It takes all sorts, I guess.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      Lower Decks is the best Trek since Ent went off the air, IMO. I didn’t care for Disco, largely. Picard was more action than I was in for at first. I’m really enjoying SNW, though.

      • UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Lower Decks is awesome. The only thing I didn’t like about Picard is that romulans and vulkans need to wear nametags if they are both going to wear federation uniforms.

    • alansuspect@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I haven’t watched Lower Decks yet, the SNW cross-over episode was fun but I found the characters from LD a bit annoying. SNW is great though, it’s like classic trek with higher production values.

      I really tried with Discovery but stopped around season 2 or 3 (around the time they took it off Netflix), it seemed to struggle with itself a lot. Maybe I need to give it another try, I like the idea of the jump to the future.

      Picard, it was cosy to be back with the old characters but the writing was pretty poor.

      • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The LD characters seemed annoying because they were cartoonish, on account of them being cartoons. They played it up to be how people act in the future. But it doesn’t feel out of place in the actual cartoon. Imho.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah, but those J.J. Abrams movies were still terrible. Star Trek made by someone who doesn’t like Star Trek. No.

    • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Star Trek directed by someone who doesn’t like Star Trek. There were a lot of people on those movies who really loved Star Trek and it showed through. They’re not the best, that’s for sure, but I still like them for what they are. However I will say that Beyond is definitely my favorite. Might have something to do with JJ not directing it at all and it feeling like an interesting mix of a TOS episode and Kelvin timeline action/adventure.

      Also Idris Elba.

      • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think Beyond was my least favorite of the newer ones personally, but I’d still put it above the last time I watched Motion Picture so it seems silly to me to trash those while elevating all the old ones.

        Star Trek is a universe of things between campy and serious. It’s possible enjoy them all, or ignore the ones to don’t.

        • rambaroo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          No one really does that though. The Motion Picture being a bad a movie is widely acknowledged by pretty much everyone. The classics are II-VI, except for V which also sucks.

          • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’ve seen some positive talk about TMP recently for one.

            Aside from that it’s easy to find people falling in to the “the new stuff sucks. The old stuff is way better” about pretty much anything Trek or not.

            Even your list doesn’t fit with the old adage of the evens being good and the odds being crap.

            • rambaroo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              III is ok but I wouldn’t say it’s bad. At least not as bad as TMP and V. There’s always people being contrarians about movies though. The general consensus is that TMP is super boring.

              Of course everyone has their own taste. Maybe some people like how slow TMP is. It’s a very different movie from the Abrams series so I wouldn’t automatically invalidate someone who liked it but not the new ones. I can’t stand Abrams’ hectic/ADHD filming style so I’ve never liked his take on ST. But that doesn’t mean the old ones are all good, the TNG movies are basically all trash except for first contact.

    • VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Did the same to star wars. He must hate sci fi because he’s ruined every sci fi show/movie he’s been involved in.

  • JWBananas@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    And then when I asked advice from people in Hollywood—I knew a handful of people, not many in those days—and I said to them, “Look, I’ve been offered this, what should I do? I’ve got plays lined up in London, I’m finally beginning to get a reputation in the West End playing leading roles.” And they told me now, this is a six-year contract, don’t worry about it. You cannot revive an iconic show like Star Trek, it cannot happen, you will be lucky to make it halfway through the season before it’s canceled.

    – Sir Patrick Stewart, on his decision to accept the role of Captain Picard

    • JWBananas@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Let me see if I can explain it to you: Nerds don’t have a problem with women; they have a problem with change. I’ll give you an example: Nerds are upset at black stormtroopers in the new Star Wars movie. Do they have a problem with stormtroopers being black? No. They have a problem with you changing their definition of a stormtrooper. I’ll be a little clearer: If the first time you introduce oatmeal to a nerd it has maple syrup in it, it better have maple syrup every fucking time, or it’s not oatmeal.

      – Larry Wilmore, on the closed-mindedness of sci-fi fans.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I take issue with the idea that being a nerd is the problem. Some people are just assholes, nerdy or not.

        • JWBananas@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I tend to think of the term as meaning “obsessive to a fault” (versus simply being passionate about something).

  • PlasmaDistortion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    As a kid I remember hating TNG when it first came out because it was so different from TOS. I still struggle to watch Discovery (too dark) and JJ Abram’s trek (lens flares) but I am sure I will eventually give them another rewatch.

      • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah.

        During the Klingon scenes, I just want someone to rush down the corridor with silly string and water balloons filled with neon shades of paint.

        I get it, their Klingon society is feudal, and on the brink of even more war. But they could still try letting some natural light in. If nothing else, their plants will live longer.

        Oh gosh, I just got the joke in The Orville about the Klingon-equivalent race being extremely light sensitive. I don’t know how I missed that before.

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I really liked how they displayed the Klingons, went a bit away from the old humans with a bad rash on the forehead trope. Also that they spoke Klingons when no non-Klingons is around.

          But yeah, the lighting was atrocious, but that was a flaw on the whole show. It all waas so unnecessary dark.

          • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah!

            The actual additions to Klingon lore, and cultrue, I loved.

            I just wished I could have seen more of it with better lighting.

            (As opposed to the the Kelvin universe, which I wish I could have sen more of with less lens flare. Haha. I’m realizing I might be a lighting snob.)

          • rambaroo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Well that also undid the lore that says all the humanoid races have a common ancestor which I thought was one of the few good pieces of ST lore.

            • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Does it? It is just more pronounced, which I like. I thought the common ancestors thing isn’t really canon

            • USSBurritoTruck@startrek.websiteM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              That bit of lore is completely silly. Humans share a common ancestor with bananas if we go back far enough, and “The Chase” proposes to go back even further than that. Still a good episode, though.

              However, nothing in Disco’s Klingon’s undoes that. We saw Klingon precursors when Worf was devolved into one in “Genesis” – another episode that has a Hollywood writer’s understanding of evolution – and he had an exoskeleton, mandibles, and spit acid.

      • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        11 months ago

        And there’s plenty to like as well. But once again, thanks for looking at this posts description about positivity and flagrantly ignore it to give throwaway negative comments. You did the same thing over on another post earlier of someone saying they like Discovery. I’m so tired of this hatefilled focus on Discovery. So many people here are able to share their opinions about not liking Discovery respectfully and without randomly throwing it in everyones faces. Why do people like you have to always double down and drill in that hatred everytime it’s even mentioned? You’re just… exhausting.

        • jackoneill@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          My main issue with Discovery was that it never felt like Star Trek. I always called it BBC’s Trek through the Stars because to me it felt like a BBC drama set in a vaguely Trek like universe. It was a good show, just didn’t FEEL like Trek. Strange New Worlds though? Feels just like the Trek I miss

          • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            It was very drama heavy. I feel like they focused a bit too much on the meta plot.

          • Kucifus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            BBC is a good comparison, similar to Dr Who and Sherlock vibe. People who enjoy those I imagine would like the Kurtzman trek shows.

        • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I like Discovery. I’m a little behind on it I think (maybe?) But it’s entertaining. Later seasons, you can tell that the writers got some inspiration from DS9 and Voyager, because that’s how it feels.

          Lower Decks is grand, and doesn’t feel like it’s Trek, but it is, and it’s definitely new.

          • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            My main issue was that they constantly broke protocol in a way no captain would have tolerated. They didn’t seem like professionals at all.

            In other shows people were demoted from a fraction of what happened on the discovery. And Michael actually gets rewarded for this behavior.

            I don’t know if that gets better after they join the new federation, I never made it this far

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Sorry, I actually didn’t even see the description. But I don’t think I overstate my dislike of the show, it’s just a part of the topic that there will be people not liking it.

          You are obviously a huge fan of the show, which is fine, but that doesn’t mean I have to be.

        • Aa!@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Michelle Yeoh made up for all my complaints. I could never get enough of her.

  • Corgana@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    My pet peeve is when people call (Disco and onward) “NuTrek” because that term was created to mock the “NuMetal” Kelvinverse films for their shallowness.

    Now it’s mostly used by people who complain about “wokeness” or “forced” diversity or what have you.

  • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Telling people to “cope” has never felt very chill or positive. I dunno. But, I’m super grateful for new trek, especially lower decks and snw!

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    Don’t forget old was once new Trek and people didn’t like it back then.

    I’ve met people who watched The Original Series as teenagers in the 60s, loved it and never wanted to watch anything else again and say they will never watch any of the new stuff.

    Personally I love it all … warts and all.

    There is just so much now and it’s not easy to find the time to see it all.

    My dream now is to see all of DS9 from beginning to end. I’ve only ever seen a handful of episodes in random order never from beginning to end.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’ve had this theory running around in my head about followups to any series. Every person has a slightly different take on what their favorite part of the show is. For OG Star Trek, maybe you liked the banter between Spock and McCoy. Maybe you liked Kirk’s swagger. Maybe you thought Scotty was hot.

    If a new production comes along years later and doesn’t reproduce the specific elements you like, then you will hate it. The producers might have been ultrafans of the original with good writing chops, a solid cast, and high production values, but if it doesn’t have those specific elements for you, then you’ll hate it.

    Those elements are different for everyone, though. The list of possible elements can be very long, and no new production can possibly check off even a significant fraction of that list. Therefore, any new production is bound to have a long line of haters regardless of its quality on its own merits.

    Was Star Trek supposed to be about Kirk, Spock, and McCoy on a ship strutting around the galaxy? TNG changed that. Is it at least supposed to be about strutting around the galaxy? DS9 changed that. Should it at least be about interacting with the alien races we know? Voyager changed that. And so on.

    JMS made a Star Trek pitch back in 2004. I like Babylon 5, but I don’t think I would have liked his version of Star Trek. The outline focused on elements I didn’t care about and just seemed meh to me in general.

    This goes for any other long running series, of course.

  • Kyle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    So nutrek is an umbrella term for Discovery, Lower decks, SNW and Prodigy right? It’s it common for people to hate all 4 with a passion? They’re all sooooo different. I can get hating one, because they are all basically different genres.

    I think people are afraid if they support one that they hate, then we’ll get more of the same. So have a knee jerk reaction to be toxic when their hated show is discussed. The irony being that historically star trek is a show that seeks to show an example of interpersonal harmony. These people do want an outlet to discuss their grievances about the shows but mostly see that outlet when someone mentions the show because they love it.

    If someone hates all 4, they must be pretty deep into some extreme ideology that somehow doesn’t conform with all of Star Trek.

    Maybe startrek.website needs a neutral zone that only allows constructive criticism but still provides an outlet for these feelings. 😅

    Edit- I forgot Picard existed, whoops!

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      NuTrek was coined to refer to the Kelvinverse films (in a pejorative way) for being edgy and shallow like “NuMetal”, but the “anti woke” crowd ruined it just like everything else.

    • 5too@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      You know, your question sparked a little realization for me - I like some of the newer series quite a bit more than some others; but I love that we’re getting such a wide variety of directions and perspectives on the themes behind Star Trek!

  • radix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Mediocre TV Star Trek >>>> No TV Star Trek

    2005-2017 were the real dark years.

  • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    Meh. TOS was so bad it got cancelled halfway through its third season. Didn’t even get to finish.

    More seriously, with all the whining people do about DSC and whatever, it’s obvious they haven’t seen TAS or Enterprise. I mean, really. TAS was - except for Mudd and Tribbles - awful. But no, let’s focus on whining instead of all enjoying Lower Decks together.

    Which makes me wonder how many people have actually seen the TNG episode LD is based on? 🤷

    Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to go have a transporter accident.

  • xkforce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I remember people hating on voyager calling it “shitty nutrek” and now it is adored like TNG, TOS and DS9 are. Give it a few years and “nutrek” will be old trek and we will have a new set of trek series that “fans” will spit on.

    • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I was twelve when Voyager started and didn’t really enjoy it. I don’t recall my parents having a bad opinion of it and they watched it regularly. I don’t really remember it getting hate, but with no internet that’s not abnormal.

  • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    So true! I still remember when people heavily disliked DS9. I was a huge fan, but dare me saying it was perhaps my favourite Star Trek. Today there are more people open about liking DS9. (✿´꒳`)ノ

  • aeronmelon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Stamets: “Say something positive about Discovery!”

    Anson Mount as Pike. Which was such a good idea it spawned an actually decent show.

    “Say something positive about Picard!”

    It’s over.

    :)

    • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not asking anyone to say anything positive about anything. I’m just asking people to be positive. Something that a lot of people seem to be utterly incapable of.

      • TheRealLinga@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Today is a beautiful day and I’m happy to have a Trek (discovery) that has hooked my kids the way TNG and DS9 hooked me!