I wonder what Lemmings are thinking of this device. I admire the innovation but just don’t see how this would be used in practice outside of memes.

    • OscarRobin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really don’t understand how things like this get made.

      Like I understand that there are tonnes of rich people with zero brainpower who fund this sorta crap, but how do the people creating it ever think anything other than ‘this concept is shit and nobody will ever want this’???

  • SpacePirate@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Saying “Integrates with OpenAI” in 2023 is exactly equivalent to saying “uses Web 2.0” from 20 years ago. Buzzword trash that says absolutely about how the product uses said technology.

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Digital slavery. Nice. Open Source offline AI exists. OpenAI is an intentional manipulative misnomer. Nothing about them is Open. AI can infer a ton of data about anyone with just a few sentences. Data is your entire future. Giving away a part of yourself or your company for exploitation, long term, is asinine stupidity.

  • Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    This looks even scarier than that TV/camera device by Facebook.

    It’s powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon processor and uses a camera, depth, and motion sensors to track and record its surroundings. It has a built-in speaker, which Humane calls a “personic speaker,” and can connect to Bluetooth headphones.

    Hell no. If a friend starts wearing a subscription-based body cam connected to “AI”, I’m going to cut them out of my life.

    It also sounds so stupid as a concept. Why would I use this instead of a phone camera? The laser display sounds like a much worse equivalent to a tiny smartwatch screen. The only use case might be when doing sports/activities, but we’d need a much more robust device for that (and much faster response times for it to be useful)

  • Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds very impractical and raises a lot of concerns. I would love to see this AI trend to die down and we could have regular affordable tech without all the spying and unreliable artificial assistants.

  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    This screams like those Kickstarter ideas where some no-name throws buzzwords around and then tries to raise a billion dollars and the project fails bad.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      raise a billion dollars … fails bad.

      That’s just a matter of which side of the Kickstarter campaign you’re on.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it was an offline AI and not a data harvesting machine, this would actually be kind of cool. Its a shame, another possible innovation stiffled by greed. I’d be down to own a device where the AI is actually mine and not a corpos.

      • hagelslager@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, until they have yo admit after a major data breach that stuff is stolen. Everytime a PR person said something, there’s a high chance they’re lying.

  • SuperJetShoes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    What a shame. A lot of guys will have worked hard on this, perhaps going on a journey from initial enthusiasm at the novel gimmick to anxiety over real-world usability.

    Sadly they’re going to lose all their money or, even worse, find a way to pay back the VC.

  • itsathursday@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not for me and especially not interested in a body cam but I welcome alternatives to these touch screen rectangles.

  • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have to be honest, I love the translation function this “has” or at least what was promised on the reveal. Having parents in law that do not speak the same language as me I would love to have something like that.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly! I think people forget that language barrier is still a thing for big chunk of the world. A frictionless on-device translator would be huge.

      • Louisoix@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure about other phones, but pixels now have an interpreter feature.