• Lodespawn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Interesting that despite it still being summer and roasty toasty in the southern hemisphere in January, the world average temp is still lower than the northern hemisphere summer.

    • fiat_lux@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The southern hemisphere has a lot more water surface area, which has a larger heat capacity, is somewhat reflective, and a lower density / conductivity.

      This is why Australians and Brazilians are known to be amphibious during summer.

      • Lodespawn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that was my thought, turns out the land water ratio in the northern hemisphere is 2:3 while it’s 1:4 in the southern hemisphere

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Averages mean almost nothing. They can’t really be used to say anything meaningful.

      1000 men vs 1000 women: 999 men earn $1 per hour. 1 man earns $1,000,000 per hour. 1,000 women earn $500 per hour. On average, men earn $1000 per hour, but women earn on average half that.

      The reality is obviously very different to the average.

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        This would only be a relevant criticism if our temperatures had a swing like 1-$1,000,000 does.

        The reality is obviously very different than you suspected.

        • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, the point remains the same. The point is averages by design remove peaks and lows by averaging them out. A system as complex as our atmosphere needs to be considered more granularly than just as by averages. Peaks and lows cause massive disasters, like in Europe right now.

  • Yuumi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yippie! I love global warming!!! Thank you big corporations you are so cool!

    • krzyz@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As far as I know that’s mostly because there’s much more land in the Northern Hemisphere and the temperature differences (day/night but also summer/winter) are much more pronounced over the land than over the sea: the land heats and cools faster.

  • cmoney@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So even if climate change isn’t real (which obviously it is.) What’s the down side? We invest in renewable energy, not pollute as much. Oh the horror!

    • cerevant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the people who made money investing in the old way stop making money. That’s it. That’s the entire problem. The fossil fuels industry wants to keep making money, and the politicians who are bribed by them want to keep getting bribes. So they create a culture war so the facts don’t matter.

      • Bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not THAT simple. For a period of time, there is a slight reduction in quality of life as people switch to renewables. Example, in many towns there are mandatory solar requirements on new homes, which inflates the cost of construction for homeowners etc. Same with the no gas hookup requirements now in some cities where you can’ get a gas line to your house… which means higher costs to run your heat etc.

        It’s one of those short term problems but it impacts people in a real way and people just don’t wanna go for that.

  • Razgriz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I’m not mistaken, before recording temps earth started as a molten volcano ridden planet billions of years ago, no?

    Compared to that this is just a slightly warmer ice age. We good.

    Checkmate Thunbergers!

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the conservatives don’t disagree that climate change is real, they disagree that humans are responsible. To them it’s things like El Niño or solar activity.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s actually a spectrum of disavowal of responsibility:

      • It’s not happening.
      • Even if it is happening, it’s not our fault.
      • Even if it is our fault, there is nothing we can do.
      • Even if there is something we can do, it’s too late to do anything.

      It’s just that the first stage (denialism) is starting to become untenable.

      • Syd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago
        • Even if it isn’t too late to do something it’s the others that should do it
        • Even if we are the ones that should do something, it’s down to everyone individually so no job for the politicians
        • Even if it is down to the state, sorry it’s too expensive.
  • ghostBones@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Climate change” is obsolete, now it’s “climate crisis”. I suppose after that it’s climate collapse and then climate desolation.

      • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d say climate apocalypse and climate societal collapse are the same thing. Apocalypse doesn’t mean extinction, otherwise how would we have a post-apocalyptic world?