With everything going on with Twitter and Reddit I feel like I have a new appreciation for having my own local knowledge base on Logseq.

Demo page: https://demo.logseq.com

  • pootriarch@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    i’d never heard of this concept! i have a disorganized stack of markdown files - notes, to-do and packing lists - that this looks ideal to tame

  • russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This looks intriguing! I currently use BookStack as a documentation platform, but it seems Logseq might be a step above something like BookStack?

  • t0fr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love Logseq! When I first started using it, I was categorizing all my notes as I was slowly moving over my knowledge base. And over time, I’ve switched over to using the Journal more and more! It’s extremely well done.

    • Bad3r@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      its lack of protocol support from firefox end. Firefox doesn’t support the FS API. The logseq team plans to migrate to a different protocol that is supported by FF OPFS