• Diddlydee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I automatically hate posts with the stupid ‘no one’ format, and the extra ‘literally no one’ is even worse.

  • mmddmm@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hum… You take a lot out when you omit the reason most generals didn’t like it was because they were already using catapults to throw the grenades…

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 days ago

        It was lighter and more portable than the Leach Trench Catapult, but less powerful. It weighed 24 kg (53 lb) and could throw an F1 grenade or Mills bomb 110–140 m (120–150 yd).

        Sounds like a perfectly viable choice in trench warfare.

  • Lembot_0001@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Was there a war where soldiers were adequately supplied with arms? I mean real war, not some over-modern army chasing pickup savages in the desert. I think not. Soldiers in all times and wars were in need to improvise.