from the the-real-agenda dept
After roe vs Wade and another 4 years of Republicans getting the chance to replace the old Republican appointees and maybe Sotomayor kicking the bucket, I wouldn’t be surprised if the SC did enable some future bans in the next couple of decades
Sad to see the entirety of Lemmy (and Reddit) cheering on the Australian Age Verification Law. Because eventually, it all leads to the same shit, real ID verifications.
I might sympathize with them more if they didn’t work just as hard protecting Republican sex-offenders.
Who made up the phrase “Christian Nationalist” like some brain dead involant who thinks it actually exists? What is it with white people always recycling the same attacks and don’t have the brain cells to think of something original?
… Christian nationalism isn’t a leprechaun. It does and has existed for a long time.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_nationalism
Its not even inherently a negative term, or at least wasn’t for a good part of history.
Wikipedia is a collection of random statements, I don’t go to that side. Wikipedia does not accuratly ddscribe the things that I’m against, and it does not properly explain the things that I support.
What a reductive way to look at information. I could send you all of the sourced links at the bottom of the page but then you’d come up with another excuse to not read anything and just complain.
What do you mean? I usually find Wikipedia’s explanations quite helpful. Maybe a little heady at times, but always factual.
