• TheFonz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 小时前

    It’s not working and they have cause for concern. Mean consumption is on a downward trend

    Edit: I meant to say in the United States it’s slowing down.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 小时前

      Unfortunately, I don’t think that’s true. Here’s some US data I found with one quick search.

      To add to that, as underdeveloped areas become more modern and income levels increase, it tends to follow that meat consumption increases along with it.

      I would be very happy to be proven wrong on this.

      • TheFonz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 小时前

        Sorry, I meant to say it’s slowing down, not trending down as I wrote originally. Most stats show this trend.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 小时前

        I imagine costs would be the main thing driving down consumption if anything. Until we subsidize alternatives like we do meat, and the prices of meat alternatives are cheaper, people will have incentives to eat real meat.

        It would cost us less to subsidize them long term, and it would lower costs of meat… And help the environment. Wins all around, yet people will vote blindly against it.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 小时前

        I love eating beef and whatnot, but my body seems to respond better to eating less of that in a given sitting. As someone growing up in the 80s, it seemed like that diet should be a 50/50 mix of beef and spinach…

        I think they are going to have a hard time convincing people to feel crummier… it’s much healthier and cheaper to stick to that old “pack of playing card portion”