For evading a $2.90 subway fare…

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 months ago

    The part they didn’t include in the headline is that the cops shot the bystander in the head.

    • Subtracty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      I automatically filled in that blank. Because, of course the cops managed to fuck up a sitiation. Not surprised.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        Even if you filled in the blank, it’s still important to call out cop-excusing passive voice every single time just to highlight how pervasive a problem it is.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      OK… It is in the very first sentence of the article.

      The other part they didn’t include in the headline is that the fare evader pulled a knife when the police stopped him. This is also in the first sentence of the article.

      • ajoebyanyothername@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        OK… It is in the very first sentence of the article.

        No it isn’t. The first sentence is “New York police have defended their actions after a bystander was shot in the head as two officers tackled a fare-evader armed with a knife in a busy subway station”. Nowhere there does it specify that the police were the ones that did the shooting.

        Edit: The article seems to have been updated since my initial comment, the opening sentence now reads “Protesters in New York have demanded accountability after police fired at a suspected fare-evader in a busy subway station, hitting a bystander in the head”. However, the headline is also different, and is about protests, so I wonder if the whole article has been replaced.

      • forrgott@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        So, what’s your point?

        Any of this change the innocence of the person they shot in the head??

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Cracking down on fare evasion doesn’t even make sense financially. Assuming those cops are making the starting salary for NYPD officers, every single cop would need to catch roughly 54 people every day, each, for them to break even on lost profits. It cant possibly be that big of an issue there.

    This is a tragedy. And one that was preventable to boot.

    • runjun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’re forgetting that having them posted there allows them harass certain people.

  • clubb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Tom Donlon, the city’s interim police commissioner, ordered a full investigation but added: “Make no mistake, the events that occurred… were the results of an armed perpetrator”.

    These spineless fucks can’t even admit they shot two innocent people, one in the head, for, like, $3. It’s not like the guy with a KNIFE could have shot them .

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 months ago

      They never found a knife. They claim someone picked it up and left with it in the chaos, which is obviously bullshit. “I’m gonna ignore the cops flagrantly firing into a crowd in my direction to go pick up that free knife”