I read the article but I didn’t check out the platform yet. Thought it might be useful for my fellow autistic people.

  • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️@7.62x54r.ru
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The thing that concerns me is that this could be used for discrimination, especially if it’s accessible by search engines. I’d put everything behind a registration wall. I would never encourage an autistic person to post their diagnosis online because there’s too much risk of prejudice.

    • Haui@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I‘m very curious how people choose the current shitty system over something made by autistic people for nds just because AI or [person]. You folks probably have no problem finding awesome jobs. Surprise: a lot of us are getting pretty fucked by the current system.

      • ZILtoid1991@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        AI has bias issues. While humans can be aware of them and course-correct, with the AI, not so much, and that’s just comes before all the biased data it was trained on.

        • Haui@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok, I understand. As someone who worked with AI and in hiring in the past I feel like (specifically ND focused) AI can’t do a worse job than traditional recruiting (which is also increasingly done with AI). But I might be wrong. On the other hand so could be you. Have a good one. :)

          • sky@codesink.io
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It absolutely can do a worse job, and be more biased. Not to mention Sam Altman is backing it? Yeesh. I’m good.

            • Haui@discuss.tchncs.deOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Can you somehow prove that? I don’t see how „absolutely“ reinforces your claim. If conventional hiring wasn’t a bag of dicks, hiring companies (which are shit as well) wouldn’t make billions in revenue.

              But I don’t recognize altman. The name sounds familiar. I might need to check him out.

              • 520@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                AI can absolutely screw up these things as bad or worse than any other program.

                AI sucks at nuances it isn’t explicitly trained on. That’s how you get AIs at eating disorder charities recommending things like 500 calorie daily deficits (this actually happened).

                AI might be able to get a technically accurate translation, but can’t always tell what’s culturally offensive or colloquially given a new meaning.

                For example, in Spanish “Soy” means “I”, and “Caliente” means “Hot”. What do you think “Soy caliente” means?

                Well if you got ‘I am hot’, Google Translate will actually agree with you…but it doesn’t mean that at all. What it actually means is ‘I am horny’.

                • Haui@discuss.tchncs.deOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, I get it. Pretty rough around the edges, no doubt. I still don’t think this makes „AI powered“ or „assistet“ worse than conventional recruiting. That’s all I‘m saying. It’s also a buzz word that gets used for a lot more than it is worth btw.